Thursday, September 10, 2026

SEIRRA LEONE BUNDO SOCIETY: MUTILATION OR JUST CIRCUMCISION??

By Israel Ojekeh Parper Snr

WESTERN EMOTIVE APPROACH TO BUNDO CULTURE USING THE AGGRESSIVELY EMOTIONAL DISCHARGED WORD "MUTILATION" ENGADED TO DEVALUE THE MORE MILDER VISION OF THE PROCEDURE OF "CIRCUMCISION"!


Why is it "MUTILATION"? Why not F G C (Female circumcision?) Men are circumcised but why are women mutilated...or, is that it.?

The question of whether the practice must/should stop is another debate in itself. The deliberate choice of the term "MUTILATION"(sic) is a skilful manipulation and evocation of emotions against the society's practice by Anti-Female attitude breakers.


Of course in Sierra Leone, this is a woman's secret society and not for men to dabble into nor especially for the Krios/Creoles. But there are many, many well to do highly placed, educated well brought up women who do not see themselves as being "MUTILATED"; for the use of this term and what it connotes, devalue the 'dignity' (as the society sees it) which is being projected or purported to be good for girls and young women undergoing the process for their future marital/ home development. 

Of course Anti-practitioners see the entire process as against women's rights forgetting that the very Human Rights Law provides rights/freedom for everyone to do what she thinks is right with her body post maturity, (18 years); which I understand the Minister is advocating. This proposition portends to protect the Bundo Society and its ancient culture minus the "cutting" practice of female circumcision. Perhaps there is a case for that approach if we are to maintain and safeguard long standing cultural values and practice. So, those having the opportunity may study/learn Home Economics in a school environment (developed from long ago 'Cookery', Needle Work, certain domestic chores which even education pioneers like Castly Hayford  could not successful implement). 

These Bundo girls and young are said to be taught practical disciplines that prepare them for future house wives. In all medical procedures improvements are made these days- perhaps the Society and the world will gain more if the surgical technics are improved and the identified risks are eliminated. I have NO PERSONAL INTEREST in the merits or demerits of Bundo practices: I just grew up in a country where it is part of our culture, like the Men PORO, or the SANDE, or WANDE, OJEH, OGUNUGU, ORO, HUNTING (and I don't mean Paddle, Bloody Mary 'Kaka debul' type Ordele).

Why should we allow WESTERN definitions and labels to devalue and eradicate our cultural heritages - what's the next stop if not BUNDO MUTILATION??



:::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::


A TEENAGER'S POINTS OF VIEW!!

THE THOUGHTS OF A SIERRA LEONEAN TEENAGER

BY EUNICE NAFFIE MUSTAPHA

From time immemorial THE THOUGHTS OF A SIERRA LEONEAN TEENAGER

BY EUNICE NAFFIE MUSTAPHA

From time immemorial secret societies have been an integral part of Sierra Leone’s cultural heritage. The Bondo Society for women, Poro Society for men and other secret societies. These societies serve as informal educational institutions. Girls learn domestic and other skills that help them throughout their lives, while boys learn skills that help them to adapt in the society at large.  

These societies create a strong bond among initiates and it involves a lot of respect bestowed on society members. These societies played important political roles in pre-colonial days and they still have an influence over traditional authorities.

The Bondo Society is very useful in Sierra Leone, our mothers and grandmothers benefitted a lot from it. They became good housewives, learning the skills of cooking, child care etc. They were taught the act of matrimonial ways in the Bondo bush. 

Girls are usually taught the act of singing, dancing etc. The rich culture of Sierra Leone is passed on.

This tradition is slowly declining, a lot of girls including myself cannot boast of knowing traditional dancing steps or songs. Modernization has affected Sierra Leoneans both positively and negatively. Girls who live in the city usually think less of the traditions prevalent in our motherland. Girls care less these days about becoming initiates of the Bondo society. The western culture has changed the mindset of most girls. One may wonder why these girls are no longer anxious about becoming initiates of this society.

The adoption of Western culture has broadened the horizon of most girls, they are fully aware of the Female Genital Mutilation (FGM). They are aware of the dangers that they are exposed to such as HIV/AIDS, Tetanus, Sterility and other infections. Western education has played a great role in the provision of knowledge. The thoughts of being subjected to such treatments scare girls away and they lose the chance of learning useful skills in the Bondo bush.

If the FGM aspect is terminated, a lot of girls would be excited about becoming initiates of the Bondo Society. The percentage of educated girls who are initiates would increase greatly. I know that the FGM aspect has been an integral part of the society but with all the risks that it entails, there would not be any harm in ending it. 

The tradition is slowly dying especially among literate women and we should not let FGM be the reason for the slow decline of such a wonderful society. African girls have to be groomed for womanhood. Our tradition should be attractive to us instead of scaring us.

I FULLY SUPPORT THE BONDO SOCIETY BUT I SAY NO TO FEMALE GENITAL MUTILATION (FGM)!!! societies have been an integral part of Sierra Leone’s cultural heritage. The Bondo Society for women, Poro Society for men and other secret societies. These societies serve as informal educational institutions. Girls learn domestic and other skills that help them throughout their lives, while boys learn skills that help them to adapt in the society at large.  

These societies create a strong bond among initiates and it involves a lot of respect bestowed on society members. These societies played important political roles in pre-colonial days and they still have an influence over traditional authorities.

The Bondo Society is very useful in Sierra Leone, our mothers and grandmothers benefitted a lot from it. They became good housewives, learning the skills of cooking, child care etc. They were taught the act of matrimonial ways in the Bondo bush. 

Girls are usually taught the act of singing, dancing etc. The rich culture of Sierra Leone is passed on.

This tradition is slowly declining, a lot of girls including myself cannot boast of knowing traditional dancing steps or songs. Modernization has affected Sierra Leoneans both positively and negatively. Girls who live in the city usually think less of the traditions prevalent in our motherland. Girls care less these days about becoming initiates of the Bondo society. The western culture has changed the mindset of most girls. One may wonder why these girls are no longer anxious about becoming initiates of this society.

The adoption of Western culture has broadened the horizon of most girls, they are fully aware of the Female Genital Mutilation (FGM). They are aware of the dangers that they are exposed to such as HIV/AIDS, Tetanus, Sterility and other infections. Western education has played a great role in the provision of knowledge. The thoughts of being subjected to such treatments scare girls away and they lose the chance of learning useful skills in the Bondo bush.

If the FGM aspect is terminated, a lot of girls would be excited about becoming initiates of the Bondo Society. The percentage of educated girls who are initiates would increase greatly. I know that the FGM aspect has been an integral part of the society but with all the risks that it entails, there would not be any harm in ending it. 

The tradition is slowly dying especially among literate women and we should not let FGM be the reason for the slow decline of such a wonderful society. African girls have to be groomed for womanhood. Our tradition should be attractive to us instead of scaring us.

[While] I FULLY SUPPORT THE BONDO SOCIETY BUT I SAY NO TO FEMALE GENITAL MUTILATION (FGM)!!! (Eunice Naffie Mustapha).

LEAVE ANNIE WALSH SCHOOL ALONE.COM - 1


WE CANNOT TURN ANNIE WALSH SCHOOL PROPERTY INTO A MARKET!! No SIR!
Folks , this is the report of the news published in AWOKO Newspaper- Some kind friend e-mailed it to me yesterday. (SEE AT THE END OF MY COMMENTS)
 Sometimes Governments tend to attempt some woeful policies which eventually hurt them in the end. We've just seen the embarassing backing down by the British Government on Education Policy - viz- to scarp the GCSE. The Secretary of State , Michael Gove curt a 'humiliating U-turn' admitting the policy reforms were "a bridge too far". Whosoever advised our beloved President to embark on this road to MOVE The Annie Walsh School from their location of nearly 200 years does not apppear to love the President because that person or persons must realise the trouble this announcement will cause. There are better options in the lacation of a Market in the Center of Freetown. Do we want to turn that area of Freetown into one gaigantic Market crowded village - once that Market is built, within a short time we surely will be bosting of one great Shanty sub-town and the whole of Kissy Road, Mountain Cut, Magazine Cut. Fireburn will merge with Upper and Lower Bombay Streets to make one sub-district of a Shanty town. If Annie Walsh School is moved , will the Gibralter Church be moved too? If the Annnie Walsh School is moved, will The Holy Trinity Church with its Primary School be moved too? Will the policy spread to the Cathedral School and the St Marys School? Where will this policy end? Yes there is great need for de-congestion but wiser policy action is needed not this frivolous and disturbing approach. Government and the City Council must now come up with policy action plan to move the illegal traders from the vicinity of The Annie Walsh- that is the focus that must be embraced now. It is clear that some action be taken , but not the one revealed by this news. I dare say I am not impressed by Mr Osho-Coker's letter. It evokes PROVOCATION- and I do not like it. I am seeing this separately from my personal point of view - yes as an APC dedicated member and I serve the Party for very long but I separate this issue totally from the Party and the Government. THIS to me is not an APC policy but a government policy which I dislike totally. The Annie Walsh is my mother's school. It is the school my mother's Grand Aunty, Miss CLARA BELFORD, (that is the sister of my maternal Grandmother from Benguima) taught for decades: many of my relatives and friends including Mrs Elizabeth Lavally-the former Deputy Speaker of Parliament, went to that school even the President's wife - The First Lady, and the wife of the Former High Commissioner of Sierra Leone to the UK Mrs Challobar and many other prominent women. THE HERITAGE MUST BE PRESERVED. Kissy Street Market and the area surrounding it can be buldozed and clear to build a SUPPER MARKET: or a Shopping Centre- this can go all the way down to 'BIG WARF'; Or Cow Yard and its visinty can be used to build this market for the Market woman dem. or Maket man dem.   BUT LEAVE ANNIE WALSH  SCHOOL ALONE .COM -

PLEASE READ THE AWOKO REPORT BELOW. 

 *****************************************************

For the construction of a Modern Market Annie Walsh School to relocate

Bishop Julius O.P Lynch, proprietor of the Annie Walsh Memorial School has received a letter from the Secretary to the President, proposing the relocation of the school from its present location at Kissy Road for the construction of a modern market.
The letter written by E.B. Osho-Coker, to the Lord Bishop of Freetown and the North states, “as you are no doubt aware, when the Annie Walsh Memorial School (AWMS) moved to its present location on Kissy Road, Freetown in 1865, the environment was ideally suitable for a school that pursued excellence in all areas including high academic performance, sound discipline and a solid Christian foundation.
However, the passage of time, has witnessed a massive growth in the city’s population and
concomitant expansion of trading activities eastwards, the area occupied by the school has become an unsuitable environment for the pursuit of academic excellence.
As Government intensifies its efforts at waste management, improvement of road safety and decongestion through “Operation WID” the compelling need for relocation of the AWMS to a more ideal site has been identified.
The selection of the site will be at the behest of the proprietors of the AWMS and arrangements will be concluded with Government for acquisition of the land and construction of the new school. The land vacated at Kissy Road will then be utilized for the construction of a modern market to be occupied by traders that are being removed from the streets of Freetown.
His Excellency the President, has instructed me to bring this proposal to your attention, so that it can be initially considered by the Church and School authorities.
Please be informed that His Excellency looks forward to a favourable consideration of the proposal contained herein,” the letter concluded.
Bishop Lynch’s first reaction to the letter dated 29th January 2013, was to write the Secretary of the Improvement Relocation Committee of the Annie Walsh Memorial Old Girls Association (AWOGA).
In his letter, he stated, “I hasten to bring this letter received on 30th January 2013 from the Secretary to the President to your notice, for a speedy consideration of the proposal contained in the document. Kindly advise me, so that I can respond appropriately alongside our proposal for privatization.
He ended his letter on this note, “This matter cries haste and must be treated as such.”
However, most Old Girls are of the opinion that there is a need to maintain the present location.
Another school of thought lamented that “but it seems we don’t know what to do with our monuments, relics and historic sites.”
The lady further affirmed “Look at the old FBC building at Cline Town. So far, no effort has been made to preserve it, stressing on “it is our history..our story we need to preserve it. What do we show our kids tomorrow?
Tourists, visitors and Sierra Leoneans need to be able to go on tour to the old FBC building at Cline Town and even the AWMS on Kissy Road. That site needs to be preserved, not destroyed. Do we know what we want to do willingly? Look at what the Islamists are doing in Mali and the attention it got from the international community. Then to think, we want to willingly destroy our heritage”, she lamented.
By Samuel Dennis John
See more


Photo: Folks , this is the report of the news published in AWOKO Newspaper- Some kind friend e-mailed it to me yesterday. (SEE AT THE END OF MY  COMMENTS)  CO   )                                                                                                                                                                                                      Sometimes Governments tend  to attempt some woeful policies which eventually hurt them in the end. We've just seen the embarassing backing down by the British Government  on Education Policy - viz- to scarp the GCSE. The Secretary of State , Michael Gove curt a 'humiliating U-turn' admitting the policy reforms were "a bridge too far".                                                                                                Whosoever advised our beloved President to embark on this road to MOVE The Annie Walsh School from their location of nearly 200 years does not apppear to love the President because that person or persons must realise the trouble this announcement will cause.   There are better options in the lacation of a Market in the Center of Freetown. Do we want to turn that area of Freetown into one gaigantic Market crowded village - once that Market is built, within a short time we surely will be bosting of one great Shanty sub-town and the whole of Kissy Road, Mountain Cut, Magazine Cut. Fireburn  will merge with Upper and Lower Bombay Streets to make one sub-district of a Shanty town. If Annie Walsh School is moved , will the Gibralter Church be moved too? If the Annnie Walsh School is moved, will The Holy Trinity Church with its Primary School be moved too? Will the policy spread to the Cathedral School and the St Marys School? Where will this policy end? Yes there is great need for de-congestion but wiser policy action is needed not this frivolous and disturbing approach. Government  and the City Council must now come up with policy action plan to move the illegal traders from the vicinity of The Annie Walsh- that is the focus that must be embraced now. It is clear that some action be taken , but not the one revealed by this news. I dare say I am not impressed by Mr Osho-Coker's letter. It evokes PROVOCATION- and I do not like it. I am seeing this separately from my personal point of view - yes as an APC dedicated member and I serve the Party  for very long but I separate this issue totally from the Party and the Government. THIS to me is not an APC policy but a government policy which I dislike totally. The Annie Walsh is my mother's school. It is the school my mother's Grand Aunty, Miss CLARA BELFORD, (that is the sister of my maternal Grandmother from Benguima) taught  for decades: many of my relatives and friends including Mrs Elizabeth Lavally-the former Deputy Speaker of Parliament, went to that school even the President's wife - The First Lady, and the wife of the Former High Commissioner of Sierra Leone to the UK Mrs Challobar and many other prominent women.  THE HERITAGE MUST BE PRESERVED. Kissy Street Market and the area surrounding it can be buldozed and clear to build a SUPPER MARKET: or a Shopping Centre- this can go all the way down to 'BIG WARF'; Or Cow Yard and its visinty can be used to build this market for the Market woman dem. or Maket man dem. BUT LEAVE ANNINWALSH ALONE .COM -                                                                                                                                                                                                                     PLEASE READ THE AWOKO REPORT BELOW. BELOW                                                                                                        *****************************************************     For the construction of a Modern Market Annie Walsh School to relocate                                                                                                           &&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&
Bishop Julius O.P Lynch, proprietor of the Annie Walsh Memorial School has received a letter from the Secretary to the President, proposing the relocation of the school from its present location at Kissy Road for the construction of a modern market.
The letter written by E.B. Osho-Coker, to the Lord Bishop of Freetown and the North states, “as you are no doubt aware, when the Annie Walsh Memorial School (AWMS) moved to its present location on Kissy Road, Freetown in 1865, the environment was ideally suitable for a school that pursued excellence in all areas including high academic performance, sound discipline and a solid Christian foundation.
However, the passage of time, has witnessed a massive growth in the city’s population and
concomitant expansion of trading activities eastwards, the area occupied by the school has become an unsuitable environment for the pursuit of academic excellence.
As Government intensifies its efforts at waste management, improvement of road safety and decongestion through “Operation WID” the compelling need for relocation of the AWMS to a more ideal site has been identified.
The selection of the site will be at the behest of the proprietors of the AWMS and arrangements will be concluded with Government for acquisition of the land and construction of the new school. The land vacated at Kissy Road will then be utilized for the construction of a modern market to be occupied by traders that are being removed from the streets of Freetown.
His Excellency the President, has instructed me to bring this proposal to your attention, so that it can be initially considered by the Church and School authorities.
Please be informed that His Excellency looks forward to a favourable consideration of the proposal contained herein,” the letter concluded.
Bishop Lynch’s first reaction to the letter dated 29th January 2013, was to write the Secretary of the Improvement Relocation Committee of the Annie Walsh Memorial Old Girls Association (AWOGA).
In his letter, he stated, “I hasten to bring this letter received on 30th January 2013 from the Secretary to the President to your notice, for a speedy consideration of the proposal contained in the document. Kindly advise me, so that I can respond appropriately alongside our proposal for privatization.
He ended his letter on this note, “This matter cries haste and must be treated as such.”
However, most Old Girls are of the opinion that there is a need to maintain the present location.
Another school of thought lamented that “but it seems we don’t know what to do with our monuments, relics and historic sites.”
The lady further affirmed “Look at the old FBC building at Cline Town. So far, no effort has been made to preserve it, stressing on “it is our history..our story we need to preserve it. What do we show our kids tomorrow?
Tourists, visitors and Sierra Leoneans need to be able to go on tour to the old FBC building at Cline Town and even the AWMS on Kissy Road. That site needs to be preserved, not destroyed. Do we know what we want to do willingly? Look at what the Islamists are doing in Mali and the attention it got from the international community. Then to think, we want to willingly destroy our heritage”, she lamented.
By Samuel Dennis John

Friday, May 22, 2026

ISAAC THEOPHILUS AKUNA WALLACE JOHNSON - TRADES UNIONIST, POLITICIAN AND LEADER

On May 10, 1965, at the age of 70, ISAAC THEOPHILUS AKUNA WALLACE JOHNSON died in a car crash in Ghana while attending the Afro Asian Solidarity Conference.

Was that a freak accident, or, was that an orchestrated political assassination?

Isaac Theophilus Akunna Wallace-Johnson (1895-1965) was a West African trade union organizer, nationalist political leader, journalist, and pan-Africanist.


Isaac Wallace-Johnson was born of Creole parents in Wilberforce, Sierra Leone. Educated mainly in mission schools, he had to abandon secondary school in order to support his family. He worked in various commercial establishments until 1913, when he became a clerk for the colonial government.


Bureaucratic Career

Wallace-Johnson's talents as an organizer and public speaker quickly propelled him to a position of leadership. At the Customs Department, he organized the first trade union in Sierra Leone, among temporary customs officers. When he called for a strike in 1914, he was fired. He entered the British army in 1915 as a clerk in the Carrier Corps. Returning to Sierra Leone in 1920, he worked for the Freetown City Council but resigned in 1926 to serve on a United States merchant ship. He published The Seafarer, an occasional journal of maritime labor news, then joined the staff of the Lagos Daily Times.

The young Isaac Wallace Johnson 


Wallace-Johnson first came to the attention of the Moscow Comintern in 1930 at an International Conference of Negro Workers in Hamburg, Germany. After organising the African Workers' Union in Nigeria in 1931, he and other black nationalist leaders were invited to the Soviet Union to attend the International Labour Defence Congress. He may have also enrolled briefly in the People's University of the East in Moscow under his favourite pseudonym, W. Daniels. Eventually, he became an associate editor of the Paris Communist publication Negro Worker, contributing articles under several pseudonyms.

Journalist and Organiser

Wallace-Johnson then moved to the Gold Coast to write for the African Morning Post of his friend Nnamdi Azikiwe and to organize workers in the mining areas. Identified by the British as an agitator and potential troublemaker, he was arrested, along with Azikiwe, for writing and publishing a seditious editorial. Convicted, he appealed and lost, then appealed to Great Britain's Privy Council.


In England, Wallace-Johnson attracted attention and support from leading British left-wing intellectuals and politicians. He also intensified his contact with George Padmore, Jomo Kenyatta, C. L. R. James, and others affiliated with the newly established International African Service Bureau. Wallace-Johnson became editor of Africa and the World and with Padmore, of the African Sentinel.

In April 1938 Wallace-Johnson returned to Freetown, intending to make his stay a short one. But customs agents seized 2,000 copies of the African Sentinel which he was bringing into Sierra Leone. The resulting publicity drew crowds to his series of public lectures. His oratory was brilliant, his targets well chosen, the population ready for leadership. Less than three weeks after his arrival, bolstered by a mass following, Wallace-Johnson inaugurated the West African Youth League, the first effective, large-scale political movement in Sierra Leone's history.

Supported by wage earners and the unemployed, the Youth League swept two elections in a row: the Freetown Municipal Council elections of 1938 and the Legislative Council elections of 1939. These successes, plus Wallace-Johnson's charismatic effect on the masses, his unrelenting exposure of labor exploitation, and his uncanny ability to discredit the colonial government, further angered British officials.

Fearing that Wallace-Johnson would foment disloyalty among African soldiers and policemen, the government enacted a series of ordinances in the summer of 1939 which severely limited his and other Sierra Leoneans' liberties. At the start of World War II he was interned as an "undesirable."

Upon his release late in 1944, Wallace-Johnson resumed his activities immediately. He was an influential spokesman at several international conferences, particularly the 1945 Manchester Pan African Conference. Within Sierra Leone, however, he entered a political cul-de-sac. The Youth League foundered, never regaining the momentum and following which it had lost during the war. Wallace-Johnson himself lost considerable popular support when he opposed the planned reconstitution of the Legislative Council to give majority representation to the protectorate. Although he was still respected and admired as a witty political critic, his stand on this issue denied him a major role in Sierra Leone's postwar independence movement. On May 10, 1965, at the age of 70, he died in a car crash in Ghana while attending the Afro Asian Solidarity Conference.


Further Reading

There is no study of Wallace-Johnson as yet, but some information can be found in James Hooker, Black Revolutionary: George Padmore's Path from Communism to Pan-Africanism (1967). Wallace-Johnson's career is recounted in John R. Cartwright, Politics in Sierra Leone, 1947-67 (1970). Good background information is in Martin Kilson, Political Change in a West African State: A Study of the Modernization Process in Sierra Leone (1966).

□ On May 10, 1965, at the age of 70, ISAAC THEOPHILUS AKUNA WALLACE JOHNSON died in a car crash in Ghana while attending the Afro Asian Solidarity Conference.

Was that a freak accident, or, was that an orchestrated political assassination?

Friday, December 26, 2025

PPRC SETTLED MEMBERSHIP AND FLAG-BEARERSHIP ISSUES BETWEEN ALHAJI SAM SUMANA Vs APC - CASE SETTLED: A WIN/WIN FOR THE PARTY.




























   Core Mandate and Functions
The PPRC operates under the mandate provided by Sections 34 and 35 of the 1991 Constitution of Sierra Leone and the Political Parties Act of 2022. Its primary responsibilities include:
 
  • Registration: Reviewing and approving applications for new political parties.
  • Monitoring & Compliance: Ensuring parties adhere to the Constitution, the Political Parties Act, and their own internal constitutions.
  • Enforcement: Imposing fines or sanctions for legal breaches, such as conduct likely to incite violence or undermine public order.
  • Mediation: Resolving internal party disputes and facilitating peace pacts between rival parties. 
Current Leadership & Contacts (2025)
  • Chairman: Emmanuel Koivaya Amara Esq. (as of June 2025).
  • Executive Secretary: Olushogo A. David.
  • Headquarters: OAU Drive, Tower Hill, Freetown, Sierra Leone.
  • Official Website: pprc.gov.sl. 
Key 2025 Activities & Rulings
  • Enforcement Actions: In late 2025, the PPRC fined the Sierra Leone People’s Party (SLPP) NLe 150,000 and the All People’s Congress (APC) NLe 120,000 for breaching Section 39(1)(d) of the Political Parties Act regarding "incendiary and inciting" remarks made by party officials.
  • Dispute Resolution: In December 2025, the Commission ordered the APC to resolve the membership controversy involving former Vice President Samuel Sam-Sumana, ruling that the party failed to follow due process in forfeiting his membership.
  • Institutional Reform: The PPRC is currently implementing recommendations from the Tripartite Report to strengthen democratic governance, with 84% implementation progress reported as of September 2025.
  • Capacity Building: In June 2025, staff underwent BRIDGE (Building Resources in Democracy Governance and Elections) training supported by the EU and International IDEA to improve electoral management skills. 

Thursday, December 11, 2025

EDWINA HAWA JAMIRU VS THE STATE OF SIERRA LEONE (PLUS JUSTICE MOMOH JAH STEVENS) - RE CYBER CRIME ARREST. CASE STUDY NO. 2.


         Ms Edwina  Hawa  Jamiru vs The State

In Sierra Leone, there is a crucial legal distinction between a Police “INVITATION” for questioning and a formal “ARREST” of an individual suspect or a concerned person of 
interest. The Law requires the Police authorities to bring an arrested person before a court and either charge or release that person(s) within a specific time frame, 
depending on the nature of the suspected offence. The practice of detaining an 
“INVITED PERSON (S)” in Sierra Leone for over seventy-two hours {(72 hrs i.e. Three 
days (3) and up to Ten (10 days) for a suspected felony offences)} as the law requires, raises serious Human Rights and Constitutional issues.
     Edwina Hawa Jamiru: on a Bright day

Before going any further, let me lay out the distinction between an “INVITATION” Vs. an 
“ARREST” in Sierra Leone of a person(s) of interest to the police.

INVITATION: Legally speaking, a Police “INVITATION” literally implies that the person of interest’s attendance is “VOLUNTARY”. One is not in custody; one is free to leave at any 
time; and one is entitled to legal representation when attending such “INVITATION” asthe demands. (Sierra Leone Constitution, Section 17 (1) (e & f).
The Police usually issue an “INVITATION” when they want to clarify a situation or gather more facts before deciding if an arrest is necessary.

ARREST: An arrest involves a physical touching or confinement, or a submission to 
custody by words or action. A person(s) once arrested is officially in police custody and 
is subject to strict constitutional time limit for detention before being brought to court (i.e. three days or 72 hours – (Section 17 (30 (b) 1919 Sierra Leone Constitution). 


        The Inspector General of S L Police 


What we observe as an occurring practice in Sierra Leone, the police many a time use 
the term “INVITATION”, to avoid the immediate legal constraints and procedural 
safeguards associated with a formal arrest. Deceitfully so, they “INVITE” the targeted 
Person(s) of Interest” for questioning (as in the ongoing case of Ms Edwina Hawa Jamiru 
– the case by extension, of Justice Momoh Jah Stevens Vs Ms Edwina Hawa Jamaru.)
However, if a person(s) is physically prevented from leaving the Police Station, when invited, that person(s) is effectively under arrest or detention, regardless of the 
terminology used. We have been seeing that tactics at play in Sierra Leone in recent 
times.
Having kept Ms Edwina Hawa Jamiru , {the twenty one (21) year old mother of Justice 
Momoh Jah Stevens baby (as confirmation by the infamous DNA TEST showing 99.999% 
of him being the father)}, for more than four days without her freedom to leave the Police 
Station, (nor being formerly charged of any offence), one could conclusively state that 
she (Edwina) has been effectively detained, even though she has not been officially 
arrested.

Legality of her Detention: The 1991 Sierra Leone Constitution Act 6 of 1991, stipulates 
that any person arrested or detained must be brought before a competent court within 
24 hours (Section 17 (3)(b). Thus, by holding her for over three (3) days now, the Police 
has violated this constitutional provision. The constitutional further stipulates that no 
person(s) should be held in custody beyond this [72 hour] period without the express 
authority of the court: another police violation of the constitution.
The legality of Ms Edwina Hawa Jamiru thus far, could be challenged via a petition to the 
High Court by her Legal representatives – her Lawyers, or ANY Friend of the court – for a 
review of the detention – a right guaranteed by the Sierra Leone Constitution. By the way 
she has been treated, her status is effectively now seen as “DETAINED WITHOUT 
PROCESS”, meaning that the Police have BY PASSED the constitutional requirement to 
seek Judicial Approval for Extended Questioning. 
These constitutional violations should be immediately leveraged by her Legal 
representatives, to demand her release or the Police formalise the arrest and bring her 
before a Magistrate Court with no further delay.



The Cyber violations: The alleged cyber-crimes for which the Police “INVITED” Ms 
Edwina Hawa Jamiru, is likely to be classified as a misdemeanour. If this is so, the 
limit the Police must bring her to a court is 72 hours (or 3 Days); for a Felony it is 
Ten (10 Days). However, these limits are contingent on the 24hours court 
appearance rule being met. Having held her for more than four days, renders the 
Police action a serious breach of her rights and that of the 1991 Constitutional 
provision. Throughout her detention within this period, she should have been 
entitled to consult and be represented at all stages, by a legal practitioner or other 
qualified persons provided by the State.
What is Ms Jamiru’s position so for on this? For the Police to hold and detain Ms Edwina 
Hawa Jamiru, for over three (3) days as the law provides, without formerly arresting 
her and bring her before a court is a violation of her fundamental Human Rights as 
enshrined in the Sierra Leone Constitution and the Human Rights Acts. Her 
detention is illegal as she is in the Police under the false premise of a
“VOLUNTARY INVITATION”, and not free to leave. The Police cannot detain an 
“INVITED” person (s) indefinitely or beyond twenty-four (24) hours constitutional 
limit without a court order. This violation of the constitution is ongoing, and it is 
totally unacceptable.

Misuse of Mental Health Claims: While the Police can detain an individual who 
appears to have a Mental Health Disorder, and is in immediate need of care or 
control, (often under specific Mental Health Acts, which may vary by jurisdiction, 
but, generally require a professional assessment within 24 hours), this power is 
for the detained individual person’s safety and NOT for indefinite Police 
custody or use as a punitive measure.
POLICE STATION IS NOT A PLACE OF SAFETY! The Police Station is generally not the appropriate legal venue for a prolonged mental health assessment. Detainees 
suspected of Mental Health issues, should ideally be taken to a ‘place of safety, 
usually hospital or clinic, for assessment by a qualified medical professional. It is not for anyone to second guess the individual’s mental capacity if not qualified so to do. 

So far, the information going around, is that the police have not formerly arrested Ms 
Edwina Hawa Jamiru, nor formerly detained her under the relevant Mental Health 
provisions. No medical examination and/or assessment by a competent/qualified doctor or Mental Health Professional has been done, nor has she been brought before a Magistrate within the24 hours (since effectively detained at the Police station) to request a Court Order which would require medical evidence - for the court to decide. 

The Police and Many Social Media Posters have labelled Ms Edwina Hawa Jamiru an 
“Unstable. It seems that the Police are using this claim of ‘Mental instability’ to justify her continued otherwise ‘unlawful detention’; thus, circumventing the strict 24- hour constitutional limit for bringing a detainee to court. While her detention is highly problematic, it is most likely illegal for the following reasons:
 “Invitation” does not equal to lawful detention. As stated earlier above, “Invitation” is voluntary and not compulsory. As Ms Edwina Hawa Jamiru has been held for 
over three (3) days now and not allowed to leave voluntarily, she is thereby “effectively detained”; whether the Police call it an “arrest” or an “invitation” the terminology does not override the constitutional provisions nor the rights she has. Secondly, by holding her over three days violates the provisions of the 1991 
constitution which mandates that any person detained must be brought before a 
court within 24-hours. Her detention for over the constitutional time limit without 
a Court appearance is a clear violation of this fundamental provision and her right. The Universal Declaration of Human Rights Article 9 provides that no one shall be subject to arbitrary arrest, detention or exile. 

It is not in the hands of the Police to decide when a Court determines stability. They 
must obey Section 17 (3) (b) of the 1991 constitution and bring her to the court 
first. The holding in detention over the time limit is a clear breach of the provision 
and her lawyers must emphasise that. The International Convention of Civil and 
Political Rights (ICCPR - Article 9 :3) also states: “Anyone arrested or detained on 
a criminal charge shall be brought promptly before a Judge… and shall be entitled to trial within a reasonable time or to release.

What the Police are doing have done to Ms Edwina Hawa Jamiru so far is purely and is 
simply an ‘abuse of power’ and an illegal detention. He legal team shoul  immediately proceed with an Habeas Curpus Application to challenge the lawfulness of her detention and secure her immediate release and not play games to KILL the case against Justice Momoh Jah Stevens with the pretension 
that she is mentally unstable, when this judge is so deep in in her accusation of his sexually exploiting her, consistently accusing him of raping her, Defamed her character and added he “DID BAD/EVIL THINGS TO ME”!, and other suspected sexual offences under the Sexual Offences Act sections 4 and/sections 6 - 2008 (as Amended in 2019). Not leaving out Offences under the Anti- Corruption Acts 
(ACC) of 2008 & 2019 – 
Sections 42 Abuse of Office;
Section 43 – Abuse of position  
Section 44 Public Officer Using Office for (sexual) advantage and subject to the ACC Act Section 134 – suspension of a Public Officer charged with corruption; in this case sexual corruption. We hope the ACC Commissioner is observing.

 Ms Edwina Hawa Jamiru has rights to Legal Representation and Information. Her rights 
in detention should have been respected from the moment she could not leave the Police Station and provided for by the State if she is incapacitated to provide one. The Sierra Leone Constitution Section 17 (2) guarantees the right to be informed of the reasons for her arrest or detention and the right to consult a legal practitioner. Her legal team/lawyers ensure these rights were upheld by the 
Police.

Ms Edwina Hawa Jamiru also like any other Sierra Leoneans, have a Right to Humane 
Treatment and Dignity regardless of what anyone thinks of her. Using the Mental 
Health claim as an excuse for prolonged detention in police cells is a degrading 
and inhumane treatment and indirect punishment. This breaches the UN 
Declaration of Human Rights (UNDHR) Article (5): “No one shall be subjected to 
torture or to cruel, inhumane or degrading treatment or punishment. This also 
equate with the Right of Vulnerable Individuals (Mental Health Aspects). If the 
Police genuinely have concerns, the legal pathway must be followed, focusing on 
care, and not punitive detention in an inappropriate Police cell environment.

Equally, the UN Principles for the Protection of Persons with Mental Illness (as the 
police and some Social Media pundits are alleging), then the stipulation of these 
principles must be adhered to. Individuals should be assessed by qualified professionals and treated in appropriate therapeutic environment, NOT indefinitely held in Police Lockups. The burden is on the State to provide a VALID MEDICAL NECESSITY and follow established medical procedure via Court order.

Following from the above, Ms Edwina Hawa Jamiru’s continued detention is a severe 
breach of the Laws of Sierra Leone and International Human Rights Standards, which could compel the High Court to order her immediate release, or a lawful transfer to a medical facility via proper court channels. 
Ms Edwina Hawa Jamiru is a young mother with has Justice Momoh Jah Stevens‘ 4-5 
months old baby. This infant’s best interests are paramount in all decisions concerning the child, a principle recognised in Sierra Leone Laws. 

Violation of the ‘Best Interest of the Child’ is enshrined in the Sierra Leon’s Child Rights 
Act 2007. And the United Nations Convention on the Rights of the Child (UNCRC), which Sierra Leone has ratified. All decisions affecting this child (and any other children) must be considered in their best interest as the primary concern. A police lockup is a highly inappropriate and potentially dangerous environment for any infant, impacting their health, hygiene, nutrition and 
development. If the child is not with her mother, that brings out another complicated factor.

The problem of Health and development Rights must also be considered. Police 
detention conditions typically lack adequate health care, sanitation and nutrition suitable for a nursing infant. This places the baby’s health at significant risk (if the baby is with her at the Police Station) and violates her right to the maximum extent of survival and development (section 21, Child Rights Act). This leads me to point out the Right to Special Care and Assistance provided in Article 25 (2) of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights. This states that “Motherhood and 
Childhood are entitled to special care and assistance”. This current DRAMATIC 
situation with Ms Edwina Hawa Jamuru versus the State, denied the baby this 
essential care and must be seriously considered. By extension, let’s look at the
Arbitrary Detention of a Child. This baby, having committed NO OFFENCE, is 
effectively being detained arbitrarily by circumstances, (if the infant is with her 
mother in the Police Station). This is a violation of the Child’s Liberty Rights.
Further violations regarding Ms Edwina Hawa Jamiru are the Right of Maternal Aspects. 
The detention also violates her Rights toa new, nursing mother, exacerbating her 
stress and vulnerability. Equally, her Right to Family Unity and Parental Responsibility while separation might be ordered in certain circumstances, the initial placement of the mother and child in prolonged Police detention without a proper Court Order is an infringement of family life and parental responsibility.

This violation also extends to the further Risk of Psychological Trauma. Thestress, anxiety and trauma, experienced by Ms Edwina Hawa Jamiru, due to her unlawful detention and concern for her very young baby, couple with all the a she has gone through including the DNA Test Case and previous encounter with the Police and Couth Bench warrant of arrest,, can directly impact on her mental  health and, by extension, the wellbeing of the infant baby through maternal distress. Ms Jamiru must not ne subject to further Inhumane or Degrading Treating. Keeping a nursing mother and her infant in Police custody conditions foran extended, unlawful period can be is tantamount to inhuman and degrading 
treatment, which is strictly prohibited under (section (20) of the Sierra Leone 
Constitution 1991. 

The court’s attention should be drawn by her Lawyers or legal representative, that the 
Police have a DUTY OF CARE to ensure that the infant child is safe and that e continuing to hold both mother and child in an unsuitable environment is an ongoing Human Rights violation. He Lawyers must expedite the Habeas Corpus Application, and this should demand he immediate release of both mother and baby together, to an appropriate safe environment. The Baby’s right is indeed 
paramount and compelling. I bring to focus, the Urgency and illegality in challenging the Police actions.
  THE SIDE CHICK Vs THE JUDGE


A STRONG OPINION- Click Link




------------------------------------------------------------------
About the Author:
The Author Israel Ojekeh Parper Snr. Is a  Lecturer  in Futher and Higher Education. A father of girls and boys, an elder brother of Seven Sisters (five still alive) and 
many female cousins and nieces and friends. He experienced caring for some of his sisters at the age of 22 – 27 with great responsibility.
 He is a Lecturer who has had long experience is education of mixed classes of male and female and students - teenagees and matured and is mindful of general behaviours of students of all characters and Background.
This Case is one of great lesson of social, religious, psychological, legal, Safeguarding and ethics.  He views the episodes and happenings with interest and evaluates it contexts and contents from many disiplines without prejudice to the parties concerned.